I think what we're doing is substantially different. The focus of my projects tends to be in publishing and tools for development. I see their product as being useful in that context, but I don't think there's a big conflict. If we are able to co-exist with products that support OPML, surely we can do the same with Markdown.#
If any additional features are needed in Drummer's support for MD, they must be driven by an actual interop use-case, nothing theoretical or nice-to-have-for-the-future. That's not enough to extend the format. It has to be about creating utility in the interop between the products, driven by actual use.#
It's a very small subset of Markdown. I don't think it makes sense to use the .md extension, but that's what LogSeq uses, so we will too, for now.#
-Drummer-
#I think what we're doing is substantially different. The focus of my projects tends to be in publishing and tools for development. I see their product as being useful in that context, but I don't think there's a big conflict. If we are able to co-exist with products that support OPML, surely we can do the same with Markdown.#
If any additional features are needed in Drummer's support for MD, they must be driven by an actual interop use-case, nothing theoretical or nice-to-have-for-the-future. That's not enough to extend the format. It has to be about creating utility in the interop between the products, driven by actual use.#
It's a very small subset of Markdown. I don't think it makes sense to use the .md extension, but that's what LogSeq uses, so we will too, for now.#
-Drummer-
#